Precision
| Characteristic Name: | Precision |
| Dimension: | Accuracy |
| Description: | Attribute values should be accurate as per linguistics and granularity |
| Granularity: | Element |
| Implementation Type: | Rule-based approach |
| Characteristic Type: | Declarative |
Verification Metric:
| The number of tasks failed or under performed due to lack of data precision |
| The number of complaints received due to lack of data precision |
GuidelinesExamplesDefinitons
The implementation guidelines are guidelines to follow in regard to the characteristic. The scenarios are examples of the implementation
| Guidelines: | Scenario: |
|---|---|
| Ensure the data values are correct to the right level of detail or granularity | (1) Price to the penny or weight to the nearest tenth of a gram. (2) precision of the values of an attribute according to some general-purpose IS-A ontology such as WordNet |
| Ensure that data is legitimate or valid according to some stable reference source like dictionary/thesaurus/code. | (1) Spellings and syntax of a description is correct as per the dictionary/thesaurus/Code (e.g. NYSIIS Code) (2) Address is consistent with global address book |
| Ensure that the user interfaces provide the precision required by the task | (1) if the domain is infinite (the rational numbers, for example), then no string format of finite length can represent all possible values. |
| Ensure the data values are lexically, syntactically and semantically correct | (1) “Germany is an African country” (semantically wrong); Book.title: ‘De la Mancha Don Quixote’ (syntactically wrong); UK’s Prime Minister: ‘Toni Blair’ (lexically wrong) |
Validation Metric:
| How mature is the creation and implementation of the DQ rules to maintain data precesion |
These are examples of how the characteristic might occur in a database.
| Example: | Source: |
|---|---|
| if v = Jack,even if v = John, v is considered syntactically correct, as Jack is an admissible value in the domain of persons’ names | C. Batini and M, Scannapieco, “Data Quality: Concepts, Methodologies, and Techniques”, Springer, 2006. |
The Definitions are examples of the characteristic that appear in the sources provided.
| Definition: | Source: |
|---|---|
| Data values are correct to the right level of detail or granularity, such as price to the penny or weight to the nearest tenth of a gram. | ENGLISH, L. P. 2009. Information quality applied: Best practices for improving business information, processes and systems, Wiley Publishing. |
| Data is correct if it conveys a lexically, syntactically and semantically correct statement – e.g.,the following pieces of information are not correct:“Germany is an African country” (semantically wrong);Book.title: ‘De la Mancha Don Quixote’ (syntactically wrong); UK’s Prime Minister: ‘Toni Blair’ (lexically wrong). | KIMBALL, R. & CASERTA, J. 2004. The data warehouse ETL toolkit: practical techniques for extracting. Cleaning, Conforming, and Delivering, Digitized Format, originally published. |
| The set S should be sufficiently precise to distinguish among elements in the domain that must be distinguished by users. This dimension makes clear why icons and colors are of limited use when domains are large. But problems can and do arise for the other formats as well, because many formats are not one-to-one functions. For example, if the domain is infinite (the rational numbers, for example), then no string format of finite length can represent all possible values. The trick is to provide the precision to meet user needs. | LOSHIN, D. 2001. Enterprise knowledge management: The data quality approach, Morgan Kaufmann Pub. |
| Is the information to the point, void of unnecessary elements? | LOSHIN, D. 2006. Monitoring Data quality Performance using Data Quality Metrics. Informatica Corporation. |
| The degree of precision of the presentation of an attribute’s value should reasonably match the degree of precision of the value being displayed. The user should be able to see any value the attributer may take and also be able to distinguish different values. | REDMAN, T. C. 1997. Data quality for the information age, Artech House, Inc. |
| The granularity or precision of the model or content values of an information object according to some general-purpose IS-A ontology such as WordNet. | STVILIA, B., GASSER, L., TWIDALE, M. B. & SMITH, L. C. 2007. A framework for information quality assessment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 1720-1733. |
Continuity of data access
| Characteristic Name: | Continuity of data access |
| Dimension: | Availability and Accessability |
| Description: | The technology infrastructure should not prohibit the speed and continuity of access to the data for the users |
| Granularity: | Information object |
| Implementation Type: | Process-bases approacd |
| Characteristic Type: | Usage |
Verification Metric:
| The number of tasks failed or under performed due to the lack of continuity in data access |
| The number of complaints received due to lack of continuity in data access |
GuidelinesExamplesDefinitons
The implementation guidelines are guidelines to follow in regard to the characteristic. The scenarios are examples of the implementation
| Guidelines: | Scenario: |
|---|---|
| Convenient and efficient platform should be made available to access data depending on the task at hand | (1) For a sales person, a web based interface run on a smart device is more suitable to quickly access data |
| Speed of the data retrieval should be acceptable for users working pace | (1) For an online customer care executive, speedy retrieval of information is necessary since the customer cannot be kept waiting (2) With the growth of the database reports become slower (Anti example) |
| Continuous and unobstructed connectivity should be ensured for data retrievals | (1) Connection lost while accessing reports (Anti example) |
| Proper concurrency control has been implemented | (1) Controlling access to data by locks |
| Technological changes in the infrastructure/system should be handled in such a way that they should not make data inaccessible | (1) New version of the software does not provide access to " X out orders" since the new version does not allow the function "X out" |
Validation Metric:
| How mature is the process of maintaining an infrastructure for data access |
These are examples of how the characteristic might occur in a database.
| Example: | Source: |
|---|---|
| 1) For example, recording the age and race in medical records may be appropriate.
However, it may be illegal to collect this information in human resources departments. 2) For example, the best and easiest method to obtain demographic information may be to obtain it from an existing system. Another method may be to assign data collection by the expertise of each team member. For example, the admission staff collects demographic data, the nursing staff collects symptoms, and the HIM staff assigns codes. Team members should be assigned accordingly. |
B. Cassidy, et al., “Practice Brief: Data Quality Management Model” in Journal of AHIMA, 1998, 69(6). |
The Definitions are examples of the characteristic that appear in the sources provided.
| Definition: | Source: |
|---|---|
| 1) Is there a continuous and unobstructed way to get to the information?
2) Can the infrastructure match the user’s working pace? |
EPPLER, M. J. 2006. Managing information quality: increasing the value of information in knowledge-intensive products and processes, Springer. |
| Data is easy and quick to retrieve. | PRICE, R. J. & SHANKS, G. Empirical refinement of a semiotic information quality framework. System Sciences, 2005. HICSS'05. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on, 2005. IEEE, 216a-216a. |
| 1) availability of a data source or a system.
2) Accessibility expresses how much data are available or quickly retrievable. 3) The frequency of failures of a system, its fault tolerance. |
SCANNAPIECO, M. & CATARCI, T. 2002. Data quality under a computer science perspective. Archivi & Computer, 2, 1-15. |